peperonity.net
Welcome, guest. You are not logged in.
Log in or join for free!
 
Stay logged in
Forgot login details?

Login
Stay logged in

For free!
Get started!

Multimedia gallery


money.co.peperonity.net

Rule of 33



Top blog
http://peperonity.net/go/sites/mview/kankar
*._.*._.*._.*._.*._.*._.*._.*._.*
*._.*._.*._.*._.*._.*._.*
chit-chat-live.peperonity.net
*._.*._.*._.*._.*
*._.*._.*
"*._.*"

Here’s a rule I’d never heard of until I read this retirement article on NPR – “I use something that I call the Rule of 33,” he says. “You need 33 times what you want to spend in your first year of retirement.” He, in that article, is Dallas Salisbury, president of the Employee Benefit Research Institute; and I can’t find any other reference to that rule.
As it turns out, it’s similar to another rule I’d read about regarding retirement savings – the 4% rule. The 4% rule says that you should expect to spend 4% of your nest egg each year if you want it to last. Between Social Security andfixed income investments, 4% of your nest egg should last you for your entire retirement under normal circumstances. As is the case with all rules of thumb,your mileage will vary.
The Rule of 33 isn’t much different since it’s a slightlymore conservative version of the 4% rule. Having 33 times what you need to spend in your first year means you’re only spending3% of your nest egg each year. One divided by 33 is about 3%.
Sadly, whether it’s 3% or 4%, all the statistics seem to show that we aren’t saving enough!

Rakesh khudia
please vote this page.


This page:




Help/FAQ | Terms | Imprint
Home People Pictures Videos Sites Blogs Chat
Top
.